<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 1.0cm; line-height: 130%;"><span style="mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ascii-theme-font: major-bidi; mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-hansi-theme-font: major-bidi; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-theme-font: major-bidi;">Pierre Hadot, the French Philosopher, considers ancient Greek philosophy as “a way of life”. He has no positive view of Scholastic Christian philosophies and believes that the rise of Christianity was the main reason behind the fall of philosophy from its main place as a way of life. Accordingly, he seriously questions the possibility of explaining and investigating Scholastic philosophies and their most important representatives, particularly Thomas Aquinas, and other religion-based-philosophies, such as Sadrian philosophy. The present paper explores the possibility of explaining Mullā Ṣadrā’s philosophy as a way of life based on Pierre Hadot’s approach to philosophy. Previously, in his study of Aquinas’ philosophy, Matthew Kruger stated that Hadot’s perception of Aquinas’ philosophy was incorrect and inaccurate while, if it is understood correctly, it is possible to explain it as a way of life based on Hadot’s approach to ancient Greek philosophy. Kruger has challenged Hadot’s view by resorting to some arguments such as Hadot’s incorrect perception of Aquinas’ philosophy and his disagreement with Thomasian tradition, Thomas’ attention to spiritual life, and presence of spiritual practice in his philosophy. In this paper, the authors initially present Kruger’s arguments and then, by providing some similar proofs from Mullā Ṣadrā’s works, try to elucidate the possibility of explaining Mullā Ṣadrā’s philosophy as a way of life based on Hadot’s approach. Following Kruger, they conclude that, at least regarding spiritual practices, which Hadot considers as one of the pillars of the theory of philosophy as a way of life, Mullā Ṣadrā’s philosophy can also be interpreted as a way of life. The novelty of this paper lies in the fact that it aims to demonstrate the possibility of such a research while being loyal to Hadot’s general theory, which was apparently considered to be a presupposition in the past. </span></p>
Manuscript profile
