• Home
  • مکتب تهران
  • OpenAccess
    • List of Articles مکتب تهران

      • Open Access Article

        1 - Hakim Sabziwari’s Impact on the School of Tehran: Continuity of the Qajar Philosophical School of Isfahan
        Mohammad Javad  Sami Saeed  Rahimian
        The present study examines the quality of the realization of Islamic schools of philosophy in the Iranian cultural field between eighth and thirteenth centuries (AH). Initially, the authors discuss the development of such schools from the “Philosophical School of Shiraz More
        The present study examines the quality of the realization of Islamic schools of philosophy in the Iranian cultural field between eighth and thirteenth centuries (AH). Initially, the authors discuss the development of such schools from the “Philosophical School of Shiraz (represented by Qutb al-Din Shirazi and Sadr al-Din Dashtaki) to the “School of Safavid Isfahan (represented by Mir Damad and Mulla Sadra) and from there to the School of Qajar Isfahan (represented by Mulla Ali Nuri and Mulla Isma’il Khwajavi), and finally to the “School of Tehran” (represented by Mulla Ali Mudarris Zunuzi, Mulla Mohammad Reza Ghomshei, and Hakim Jilwah). Then they deal with the key role of Hakim Sabziwari in the development of the third school in the School of Tehran. Clearly, because of the chosen period, there is no place for focusing on the schools preceding the philosophical school of Shiraz, such as “School of Maragheh” (represented by Khawaja Nasir al-Din Tusi) or the schools succeeding the School of Tehran, such as the “Neo-Sadrian School” (represented by ‘Allamah Tabataba’i). In line with the purpose of the study, the authors have tried to refer to the specific features of the four target schools, the social conditions dominating the society, and the reasons behind people’s referring to the distinguished philosophers and scholars of each school. Following a library method of research and a comparative design, this study demonstrates that the rulers’ coercion and cruelty and the scholars’ attempts at granting legitimacy to their acts and following them were the main causes of the creation of certain pseudo-parties and centers around spiritual authorities in the garb of philosophers and Sufis. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - سرگذشت، احوال و مقام فلسفی حکیم میرزا حسن کرمانشا
        عباسعلی منصوری
        حکیم میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی (متوفای 1336 ق) از حکمای بزرگ مکتب تهران است کهفیلسوف جامع و حکیم فاضل جناب میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی حکیمی است که به گفته سید جلال الدین آشتیانی جامع ترین فیلسوف بعد از حکمای اربعه تهران است و تقریبا تمام اساتید فلسفه بعد از او بی واسطه یا با واسطه ش More
        حکیم میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی (متوفای 1336 ق) از حکمای بزرگ مکتب تهران است کهفیلسوف جامع و حکیم فاضل جناب میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی حکیمی است که به گفته سید جلال الدین آشتیانی جامع ترین فیلسوف بعد از حکمای اربعه تهران است و تقریبا تمام اساتید فلسفه بعد از او بی واسطه یا با واسطه شاگرد ایشان بوده اند.اما علا رغم نقش و مقام بزرگی که در تاریخ فلسفه معاصر ایران دارد، گمنام مانده و قدر و منزلت ایشان در سطح مجامع علمی نیز مغفول مانده است.این پژوهش تلاش نموده است که با دقت و صبوری این حکیم فاضل را به علاقمندان به تاریخ کرمانشاه و به مجامع علمی فلسفه و علاقمندان به فلسفه اسلامی معرفی نماید.امتیازات و دست آوردهای این پژوهش عبارتند از: تفصیلی ترین پژوهش در مورد میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی است در عین حال سعی وافر شده است که حتی المقدور از ورود به مباحث حاشیه ای پرهیز شود2- بررسی اساتید میرزا حسن و نوع ارتباط وی با این اساتید3- فرضیه یادگیری فلسفه از طریق آموزش خودخوان فلسفه 4-اشاره به شاگردانی که استاد صدوقی سها از ایشان نامی به میان نیاورده بود5-توضیح مفصل و تحلیلی مقام علمی میرزا حسن در پنج بخش: گستره مهارتی و دانشی میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی ، عمق اندیشه و قدرت تحلیل میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی ، مشرب فلسفی میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی ،جایگاه عرفان در اندیشه میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی،توانایی و مهارت در تدریس 5- جمع آوری حکایت نقل شده در مورد میرزا حسن کرمانشاهی . Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        3 - Islamic Philosophy’s Encounter with Western Philosophy in Qajar Period
        Tahereh Kamalizadeh
        The Qajar Period is of great significance in contemporary history of Iran from different aspects, particularly cultural and scientific ones. On the one hand, during this period Islamic philosophy and wisdom came to fruition in the new capital city with the establishment More
        The Qajar Period is of great significance in contemporary history of Iran from different aspects, particularly cultural and scientific ones. On the one hand, during this period Islamic philosophy and wisdom came to fruition in the new capital city with the establishment of Tehran’s philosophical school, and the beginning of cultural change and rationalism in this city resulted in its scientific and cultural flourishing. On the other hand, this period marked the commencement of cultural relationships with modern Europe and introduction of modern Western philosophy to Iran through the translation of educational and political texts and books. However, this event was not taken seriously by either masters and researchers of Islamic philosophy or intellectuals and did not lead to a serious philosophical challenge during this period. Using a descriptive-analytic method entailing library research and document analysis, this study investigates two main approaches to modern Western Philosophy, modernist and kalami, in Qajar Period. The focus of this paper is on the encounter of masters of Islamic philosophy with modern Western philosophy. The findings indicate the lack of a serious attention to this philosophy in the traditional field of Islamic philosophy, particularly in Tehran School and lack of any interaction with it on the part of philosophers, teachers, and researchers engaged in Islamic philosophy. Here, while criticizing this encounter and investigating its various cultural, social, and epistemological reasons, the author suggests a dialog and interaction with modern philosophy instead of banishing and ignoring it. Manuscript profile