List of Articles Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - The Philosophical-Historical Development of the Equivalents of Aristotle’s Hyle
  Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh Seyyed Ebrahim  Musavi Malek Hosseini
  In this paper, the authors examine and discuss the different equivalents of the Aristotelean term of hyle in Latin, Arabic, and Persianin terms of their etymological and conceptual features. Moreover, they try to reveal the relationship between this concept and the conc More

  In this paper, the authors examine and discuss the different equivalents of the Aristotelean term of hyle in Latin, Arabic, and Persianin terms of their etymological and conceptual features. Moreover, they try to reveal the relationship between this concept and the concept of mother and female gender in Old Persian. It seems that the early translators of Greek philosophy, because of the conceptual relationships between hyle and mother in the writings of Plato and Aristotle, chose some equivalents for hyle which derived from the meanings of mother and female gender. This is particularly important because the concept of philosophical matter which is rooted in Aristotle’s philosophy and is commonly used today, especially in empirical sciences, is rooted in the concepts of mother and female gender in terms of its historical and philosophical background. This has prompted the early translators of Greek philosophy who were looking for near equivalents for the Greek hyle to consider this relationship and create terms which could transfer the meaning of this word correctly. However, this does not mean that in Aristotle’s philosophy, similar to some mythological beliefs, hyle indicates that the world is the offspring of the intimacy of male and female elements. Rather, it means that among ancient Greeks, including Aristotle and Plato, the female gender has been introduced as the receptacle of form in the birth of human beings and animals. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Challenges of Aristotelian Matter and Potency in Muslim Philosophers’ Discussions
  Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh Seyyed Ebrahim  Musavi Malek Hosseini
  In the modern period, contemporary researchers of Aristotle’s philosophy have paid greater attention to the concept of prime matter, which is surrounded by a number of challenging discussions. In this paper, the authors have compared the two concepts of matter and poten More

  In the modern period, contemporary researchers of Aristotle’s philosophy have paid greater attention to the concept of prime matter, which is surrounded by a number of challenging discussions. In this paper, the authors have compared the two concepts of matter and potency, which are very close to each other, in Aristotle’s philosophy. Researchers have generally ignored the duality and separation of these two concepts from each other, while attending to their differences makes the explanation of the challenging issues in relation to Aristotelian prime matter much easier. One of such distinctions is the hypokeimenon or substratum nature of Aristotelian matter which prevents its confusion with the concept of potency due to its independence. In Aristotle’s writings, the terms hyle and dunamis (matter and potential) have always been used alongside each other, which has made it difficult to distinguish them from each other. However, it must be taken into consideration that this distinction plays a fundamental role in understanding prime matter and the related challenging problems, such as the quality of the combination of matter and form and the identity of new substance. Some philosophers, such as Ibn Sīnā, have paid attention to the various features of matter and differentiated them from each other. Among contemporary philosophers, Murtaḍa Muṭahharī has also posed some discussions in this regard, which are emphasized in this paper. An analysis of such views demonstrates that prime matter cannot be merely the same as absolute potency; rather, it is also a loci for receiving form. Hence, based on Aristotelian principles, the survival of prime matter is necessary. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Zoroastrian Wisdom and the Magi Religion in Ancient Greek and Roman Sources
  Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh
  20.1001.1.20089589.1400.12.2.3.1
  The impact of Zoroastrian religion and worldview on Greek philosophy, ancient philosophers, and generally on history of philosophy as a fundamental topic regarding the historical development of philosophy has always been of interest to researchers. Ancient thinkers have More

  The impact of Zoroastrian religion and worldview on Greek philosophy, ancient philosophers, and generally on history of philosophy as a fundamental topic regarding the historical development of philosophy has always been of interest to researchers. Ancient thinkers have always spoken of Zoroastrian wisdom and philosophy and connected them to the Magi religion. The present paper examines Zoroastrian philosophy and its origin in the Magi religion based on ancient Greek and Roman sources. Based on such sources, the founder of this school of philosophy is a Zoroastrian who is much older than Zoroaster, the author of Avesta, who lived in the time of Goštāsp. Therefore, if we wish to study Zoroastrian wisdom and philosophy from the viewpoint of ancient Greek and Roman thinkers, we must seek its roots in the Magi religion; a religion that is apparently one of the oldest philosophical schools of ancient times and first appeared in Iran. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - Aeons in Christian Gnosticism (Based of Saint Irenaeus’ Reports)
  Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh
  20.1001.1.20089589.1401.13.1.5.8
  Aeons are among fundamental concepts in Christian gnosticism. On the one hand, they are rooted in the myths of ancient Greek gods and, on the other hand, they originate in Platonic philosophy and school and are integrated with the elements of Christianity and the Holy B More

  Aeons are among fundamental concepts in Christian gnosticism. On the one hand, they are rooted in the myths of ancient Greek gods and, on the other hand, they originate in Platonic philosophy and school and are integrated with the elements of Christianity and the Holy Book. Therefore, a conceptual and technical explanation of Aeons is important and plays a significant role in understanding the origins of early philosophical schools and ideas. Gnosticism and its founders, such as Valentinus, precede Plotinus, the founder of Neo-Platonism; hence, a clarification of gnostic concepts and, particularly, an analysis of the emanation of existents are of great importance in this school. Moreover, the etymology of dualism in gnosticism speaks of its original and fundamental relationship with Zoroastrian wisdom and the magi’s religion in ancient Iran. Therefore, a study of this point can reveal the integration of philosophical elements in ancient Iran and ancient Greece and the New and Old Testaments. Accordingly, this paper is intended to explain the concept of Aeons and the reasons of their emergence in Christian gnosticism based on Saint Erenaus’ reports and through investigating their roots in the technical philosophical terms in ancient Greece and the New and Old Testaments. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - The Relationship Between Sophia and Ṣūfī in Ancient Texts and Sources Based on Bīrūnī’s Narrative
  Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh
  20.1001.1.20089589.1401.13.3.1.8
  This paper concerns the narrative by Abū Rayḥān al-Bīrūnī, the prominent scientist of the world of Islam, of the unity between Sophia and Ṣūfī as an introduction to the discussion of the truth of wisdom and philosophy in ancient texts. Most modern researchers do not see More

  This paper concerns the narrative by Abū Rayḥān al-Bīrūnī, the prominent scientist of the world of Islam, of the unity between Sophia and Ṣūfī as an introduction to the discussion of the truth of wisdom and philosophy in ancient texts. Most modern researchers do not see any relationship between Ṣūfī and the Greek Sophia and believe that Ṣūfī is lexically related to such words as wool and woolen garments. In fact, they deny the relationship of Greek philosophy and Sophia with Sufism and Ṣūfī. Here, the author has tried to explore the origin of philosophy and wisdom of ancient Greece based on ancient sources in order to view Greek Sophia from another perspective. This study mainly begins with the relationship between Greek Sophia and Ṣūfī based on al-Bīrūnī’s narrative; however, its main purpose is to speak of the truth of philosophy and wisdom and their origin based on ancient texts. Such sources establish a specific connection between the distinguished philosopher of various ethnic groups in Iran, Greece, and India, as well as between gnostics and Ṣūfīs. Abū Rayḥān al-Bīrūnī’s words concerning the relationship between Sophia and Ṣūfī provide a number of solid proofs in this regard in ancient texts and sources. The root of the unity of Greek Sophia and Ṣūfī in the Islamic world goes beyond the history of post-Islam Sufism. It should be, in fact, sought in the historical development of wisdom originating in the philosophical thoughts of ancient Greece, Iran, and India, the views and beliefs of Harranian, the Magi, Zoroastrians, and Sabians, and their relationship with the divine prophets. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  6 - Daemon in ancient Greece and its connection with Daeva in Zoroastrian wisdom and Ginn in Islamic wisdom
  Hojjatullah  Askarizadeh
  20.1001.1.20089589.1402.14.3.5.9
  There are common facts about the daimon in ancient Greece and the Davea in Zoroastrian wisdom and the genie (Jinn) in Islamic theology. Although in Greek wisdom, a distinction is made between daimon and Theos in some cases, but in most cases, daimon and divine affairs a More

  There are common facts about the daimon in ancient Greece and the Davea in Zoroastrian wisdom and the genie (Jinn) in Islamic theology. Although in Greek wisdom, a distinction is made between daimon and Theos in some cases, but in most cases, daimon and divine affairs are confused, and this creates the challenge of how the gods of ancient Greece gradually become turned into demons and devils in the Middle Ages. In Zoroastrian wisdom, there is not only a distinction but also a complete opposition between the divine gods and the Daveas, the former being divine and good and the latter evil and satanic. In the Islamic worldview and teachings, there is a creature called a jinn, which is neither from the realm of angels nor is it absolutely evil or satanic On the one hand, it is close to the world of spiritual and angels, and can do supernatural and superhuman things, and on the other hand, in many cases, it is the source of evil and filth, which in this case is called Satan. Based on the approach of Muslim philosophers in the classification of spiritual and non-physical beings and the distinction they made between angels, righteous jinn and devils, the challenges of the ancient Greek daemons can be explained more precisely. This explanation will play an important role in understanding the origins of the opinions and schools of ancient wisdom, especially ancient Greek wisdom And the challenges of ancient Greek daemons and ancient wisdom can be explained Manuscript profile