Unity of Corporeal Substance: The Study of an Aristotelean Challenge
Subject Areas : Comparative studies in the field of history of philosophyFaezeh Hajihosseini 1 , Mustafa Zali 2 *
1 - MA in Philosophy, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Philosophy Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: corporeal substance, unity, matter, form, paradox of unity, unitary synthesis of matter and form,
Abstract :
This paper focuses on a challenge rooted in Aristotle’s writings on the truth of corporeal substance. On the one hand, body as substance is always concomitant with a kind of ontological priority. Therefore, the unity of corporeal substance is prior to the unity of matter and form. On the other hand, Aristotle’s perception of the truth of change necessitates that matter, as one of the components of body, remains fixed in the process of change in order to preserve the unity of change. Thus, corporeal substance consists of matter and form, is posterior to them, and depends on them. The response to this problem, which is called the “paradox of unity”, is formulated in two traditional and new molds of interpretation. The present study initially reviews the main elements of these two interpretations and then, through distinguishing between the two types of unity, namely vertical and horizontal, demonstrates that the traditional interpretation is incapable of explaining the vertical unity of matter and form. It also stipulates that the new interpretation is insufficient for clarifying horizontal unity. Finally, the authors provide a unitary interpretation of the synthesis of matter and form, as a third response to this question, which explains both horizontal and vertical forms of unity free from previous problems.
ابن‌سینا (۱۴۰۱) الإشارات و التنبیهات، تصحیح و مقدمه نجفقلی حبیبی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
جوادی آملی، عبدالله (۱۳۹۳) رحیق مختوم، ج۱۴، قم: اسراء.
زالی، مصطفی (۱۳۹۷) «ترکیب اتحادی ماده و صورت و مسئله اتحاد عاقل و معقول»، فلسفه، دورۀ ۱۶، شمارۀ ۱، ص7۷ـ57.
صوفی، جواد؛ کهنسال، علیرضا (1401) «ترکیب ماده و صورت از نظر مشاء؛ اتحادی یا انضمامی»؟، فلسفه، دورۀ ۲۰، شمارۀ ۲، ص172ـ159.
طباطبائی، سیدمحمدحسین (۱۳۸۶) نهایة الحکمة، تعلیقات غلامرضا فیاضی، قم: مؤسسة امام خمینی(ره).
عبودیت، عبدالرسول (۱۳۹۳) حکمت صدرایی به‌روایت علامه طباطبایی: مبحث جوهر، قم: مؤسسة امام خمینی(ره).
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی (۱۳۹۳) تعلیقه علی نهایة الحکمة، قم: مؤسسة امام خمینی(ره).
مطهری، مرتضی (۱۳۷۸) مجموعه آثار، ج11، تهران: صدرا.
ملاصدرا (1382الف) تعلیقات الهیات شفاء، تصحیح و تحقیق نجفقلی حبیبی، تهران: بنیاد حکمت اسلامی صدرا.
ملاصدرا (1382ب) الشواهد الربوبیة فی المناهج السلوکیة، تصحیح و تحقیق سیدمصطفی محقق داماد، تهران: بنیاد حکمت اسلامی صدرا.
ملاصدرا (۱۳۸۳) الحکمة المتعالیة فی الأسفار الأربعة، ج۳، تصحیح و تحقیق مقصود محمدی، تهران: بنیاد حکمت اسلامی صدرا.
ملاصدرا (۱۳۸۹) مجموعه رسائل فلسفی، ج1، تصحیح و تحقیق سید محمود یوسف ثانی و حامد ناجی اصفهانی، تهران: بنیاد حکمت اسلامی صدرا.
ملاصدرا (۱۳۹۷) الحکمة المتعالیة فی الأسفار الأربعة، ج۵، تصحیح و تحقیق رضا محمدزاده، تهران: بنیاد حکمت اسلامی صدرا.
ملاصدرا (۱۹۸۱م) الحکمة المتعالیة فی الأسفار العقلیة الأربعة، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
Aristotle (1984). Complete Works. Ed. by J. Barnes. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Burnyeat, M. (1995) Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible? Essays on Aristotle's De Anima. ed. by M. C. Nussbaum &, A. O. Rorty. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 15-26.
Byrne, Ch. (1995) Prime Matter and Actuality. Journal of the History of Philosophy. vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 197-224.
Charles, D. (1994). Matter and Form: Unity Persistence, and Identity. Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle's Metaphysics. ed. by T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, & M. L. Gill. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 75-105.
Cohen, S. M. (1995). Hylomorphism and Functionalism. Essays on Aristotle's De Anima. ed. by M. C. Nussbaum &, A. O. Rorty. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57-73.
Gill, M. L. (1989). Aristotle on Substance. Princeton, N.J.: Princton University Press.
Gill, M. L. (2010). Unity of Definition in Metaphysics H.6 and Z.12. Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle. ed. by J. G. Lennox & R. Bolton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97-121.
Graham, D. W. (1987). The Paradox of Prime Matter. Journal of the History of Philosophy. vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 475-490.
Granger, H. (1990). Aristotle and the Functionalist Debate. Apeiron. vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 27-49.
Hartman, E. (1976). Aristotle on the Identity of Substance and Essence. The Philosophical Review. vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 545-561.
Hennig, B. (2020). Form and Function in Aristotle. History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis. vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 317-337.
Koslicki, K. (2018). Form, Matter, Substance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kosman, A. L. (1987). Animals and Other Beings in Aristotle. Philosophical problems in Aristotle’s Biology, ed. by J. Lennox & A. Gotthelf, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 360-391.
Kosman, A. L. (2013). The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle's Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krizan, M. (2016). Prime Matter without Extension. Journal of the History of Philosophy. vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 523-546.
Lang, D. P. (1998). The Thomistic Doctrine of Prime Matter. Laval théologique et philosophique. vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 367-385.
Lewis, F. A. (1995). Aristotle on the Unity of Substance. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. vol. 76, no. 3-4, pp. 222-265.
Lewis, F. A. (2013). How Aristotle gets by in Metaphysics Zeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Luyten, N. (1965). Matter as Potency. in E. McMullin. The Concept of Matter in Greek and Medieval Philosophy. University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 122-133.
Peramatzis, M. (2023). Aristotle on unity in Metaphysics Z.12 and H.6. Ratio. no. 36, pp. 243-259.
Perler, D. (2023) Suárez’ Compositional Account of Substance. The History of Hylomorphism: From Aristotle to Descartes. Ed. by David Charles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 351-376.
Pfeiffer, Ch. (2024). Aristotle on the Cause of Unity: The Argument of Metaphysics H.3-6. Phronesis. vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 123-157.
Robinson, H. M. (1974). Prime Matter in Aristotle. Phronesis. vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 168-188.
Solmsen, F. (1958). Aristotle and Prime Matter: A Reply to Hugh R. King. Journal of the History of Ideas. vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 243-252.