@article{ author = { andMohammad Javad Sabzevari}, title = {Eros and its Semantic Change in Proclus }, journal = {History of Philasophy}, volume = {8}, number = {30}, page = {39-68}, year = {2018}, publisher = { Iranian Society of History of Philosophy}, issn = {2008-9589}, eissn = {2676-5160}, doi = {}, abstract = {This paper initially deals with the meaning, place, and role of eros in the view of Proclus and, then, presents the changes that he created in the meaning or role of this concept by bringing it close to its rival Christian concept of ágape. Although Proclus himself never acknowledged this semantic change in any of his books and believed that what he had done was in conformity with Platonic philosophy. Here, the writers demonstrate that, given his intended meaning of eros, there is no opposition between this concept and ágape, and they are, rather, consistent with each other.}, keywords = {Proclus beauty Eros agape. }, title_fa = {اروس و تغيير معناي آن نزد پروکلوس}, abstract_fa = {هدف نوشتار حاضر در وهلة نخست پرداختن به معنا، جايگاه و نقش اروس نزد پروکلوس است و سپس در پي نشان دادن تغيير معنا يا تغيير نقشي است که در اين مفهوم توسط وي روي داده و معناي اين واژه را به مفهوم رقيب خود يعني آگاپة مسيحي نزديک کرده است. هرچند خود پروکلوس در هيچيک از آثارش به اين تغيير معنايي اذعان نکرده و حتي بر اين باور است که اين کار را در راستاي تفکر افلاطوني انجام ميدهد، اما چنانکه خواهيم ديد با معنايي که او از اروس مراد ميکند، ديگر تقابلي ميان اروس و آگاپه در ميان نخواهد بود، بلکه آن دو با يکديگر سازگار ميشوند.}, keywords_fa = {پروکلوس زيبايي اروس آگاپه }, URL = {rimag.ir/fa/Article/23315}, eprint = {rimag.ir/fa/Article/Download/23315},