Mendeley TY _ JOUR ID - 13960930151019798 TI - Heidegger’s Interpretation of Anaximander’s Arche, Participation, and Time JO - History of Philasophy JA - ES LA - fa SN - 2008-9589 AU - Pourhasan Ghasem AU - Ahmadi Mehrdad AD - علامه طباطبائي AD - دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 VL - 4 IS - SP - 81 EP - 100 KW - Heidegger Anaximander difference identity participation DO - N2 - Heidegger believed that a metaphysical conceptualization of the relationship between identity and difference is not original and maintained that such negligence is rooted in the fact that metaphysics has forgotten “difference as such” as pure unfoldedness. In his view, the Greeks had a clearer image of the above-mentioned relationship. In his interpretation of Anaximander’s view, Heidegger demonstrates that, while viewing all being as a whole, Anaximander does not ignore the differences among them. Based on Heidegger’s interpretation, through introducing apeiron and time as two fundamental elements, Anaximander managed to have an early encounter with the relationship between identity and difference. Heidegger called this relationship “participation” and maintained that this concept can lead one to fundamental difference. This is because, unlike metaphysical theories, it does not depend on external elements, upon which correlation relies; rather, it depends on the being of beings. Apeiron and time open the door to a pure space in the unfoldedness of which beings find their essence and, at the same time, depend so much on each other that the whole is created based on their mutual relation. UR - rimag.ir/en/Article/23301 L1 - rimag.ir/en/Article/Download/23301 ER -