@article{ author = {Fereshteh Nadry Abyaneh}, title = {A Study of the Rise of Shi‘ite Gnosis in Ibn Sina’s Life and Works with an Emphasis on his Ideas in Namat al-‘arifin}, journal = {History of Philasophy}, volume = {7}, number = {26}, page = {1-10}, year = {2016}, publisher = { Iranian Society of History of Philosophy}, issn = {2008-9589}, eissn = {2676-5160}, doi = {}, abstract = {A gnostic’s method of unveiling entails the purification of the soul, self-refinement, and observation of divine traditions and duties. Islamic gnosis is divided into two theoretical and practical types. In Ibn Sina’s view, any opposition to gnosis and gnostics is due to being ignorant of the station of gnostics. Similarly, any agreement with gnostics and respecting and appreciating them result from being cognizant of their supreme status. Naturally, people usually stand against and oppose what is unknown to them. After demonstrating the necessity of piety and worship as the necessary conditions for happiness, Ibn Sina maintains that they are not enough for attaining this goal and considers gnosis to be superior to the above qualities. However, he emphasizes that a gnostic is an individual who is not content even with attaining the status of being a true gnostic and prefers truth to gnosis. The Shi‘ite gnosis relies on a treasure of traditions and prayers in addition to Qura’nic verses. In the history of gnosis, Ibn Arabi (died in 638 AH) and Seyyed Haydar Amuli (died in 787 or 794 AH) are called the fathers of Islamic and Shi‘ite gnosis. Ibn Sina (died in 428 AH) enjoys great fame in the eye of the public in the fields of Peripatetic philosophy and medicine and has been called the new Aristotle; however, he has not developed a great name in the field of gnosis. Nevertheless, a study of his life and works prove the opposite. There is no doubt about his being a Shi‘ite Muslim; hence, this paper aims to demonstrate that the fundamental principles of the kind of gnosis he discusses in his works were developed under the influence of Shi‘ite gnosis (although the related references have not been directly mentioned in Ibn Sina’s works).}, keywords = {father of gnosis theoretical gnosis practical gnosis Shi‘ite gnosis Ibn Sina Namat al-‘arifin}, title_fa = {تحقيقي در ظهور عرفان شيعي در احوال و آثار بوعلي‌سينا با تأكيد بر مضامين نمط العارفين}, abstract_fa = {روش عارف در کشف، تصفيه روح و تهذيب و رعايت آداب و سنن الهي است. عرفان اسلامي در دو شاخه عرفان نظري و عملي تحقق مييابد. از نظر ابن‌سينا، مخالفت با عرفان و عرفا بجهت نشناختن مقامات عارفين است و موافقت و تعظيم و بزرگداشت آن، نتيجه شناخت است. زيرا مردم نسبت به آنچه نميشناسند مخالفت و دشمني ميورزند. شيخ پس از اثبات لزوم زهد و عبادت بعنوان شرط لازم براي رسيدن به سعادت، آنها را کافي ندانسته و عرفان را مافوقشان ميداند، اما تأكيد دارد عارف کسي است که حتي به رسيدن به مقام عرفان هم بسنده نکرده و حق را بر عرفان ترجيح ميدهد. عرفان شيعي علاوه بر تکيه بر آيات، از گنجينه روايات و ادعيه نيز برخوردار است. در تاريخ علم عرفان، ابن‌عربي و سيدحيدر آملي پدر عرفان اسلامي و شيعي خوانده شده‌اند. ابن‌سينا هر چند در فلسفه مشاء و طبابت شهرتي عام يافته و وي را ارسطوي جديد ناميده‌اند، اما در حوزه عرفان نامور و از حق تقدم برخوردار نشده است، در حالي که بررسي آثار و احوال ايشان نمايانگر احراز اين حق است. در شيعه بودن ابن‌سينا ترديدي نيست اما بيان و اثبات اين مطلب که پايه‌ها و مدارج عرفان مطرح شده در آثار وي متأثر از عرفان شيعي است (هر چند بر منابع آن در آثار ابن‌سينا تصريح نشده است)، موضوع نوشتار حاضر ميباشد. }, keywords_fa = {پدر عرفان عرفان نظري عرفان عملي عرفان شيعي ابن‌سينا نمط العارفين}, URL = {rimag.ir/fa/Article/23162}, eprint = {rimag.ir/fa/Article/Download/23162},